Reviewer Name: Paper Code: Name of the First Author: Title of the paper: YOU CAN GIVE A MARK FOR EACH ITEM (0-10 scale) ITEM 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Originality Interest Quality Elaboration Objetives/Conclusions References CONCLUSION ABOUT THE PAPER TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE PRESENTED DIGEST: Excellent Good Average Poor Bad Very Bad REMARKS FOR THE AUTHORS: REMARKS FOR THE SECRETARIAT:
Reviewer Name:
Paper Code:
Name of the First Author:
Title of the paper:
YOU CAN GIVE A MARK FOR EACH ITEM (0-10 scale) ITEM 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Originality Interest Quality Elaboration Objetives/Conclusions References CONCLUSION ABOUT THE PAPER TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE PRESENTED DIGEST: Excellent Good Average Poor Bad Very Bad REMARKS FOR THE AUTHORS: REMARKS FOR THE SECRETARIAT:
YOU CAN GIVE A MARK FOR EACH ITEM (0-10 scale)
CONCLUSION ABOUT THE PAPER TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE PRESENTED DIGEST:
REMARKS FOR THE AUTHORS:
REMARKS FOR THE SECRETARIAT:
